<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Essay on ~miguelbernadi</title>
    <link>https://miguelbernadi.lobber.eu/categories/essay/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Essay on ~miguelbernadi</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 16:23:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://miguelbernadi.lobber.eu/categories/essay/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Opinionated tools are better</title>
      <link>https://miguelbernadi.lobber.eu/posts/opinionated-tools-are-better/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 May 2022 11:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://miguelbernadi.lobber.eu/posts/opinionated-tools-are-better/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I have seen a rise in the number of opinionated tools present in the&#xA;common mindspace in the last decade. These tools usually cause&#xA;controversy by limiting user choice and following a set path through&#xA;problem space. But why have they become popular? Why are they&#xA;&amp;ldquo;better&amp;rdquo;?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
